Tuesday, May 12, 2009

Impacted maxillary canines: A review

by Samir E. Bishara BDS, DDS, D. Ortho., MS
Iowa City, Iowa


Am J Orthodo Dentofac Orthop (1992) 101: 159-171


Incidence of Canine Impaction:
Incidence of max canine impaction sited between 0.92-2.2%. Of all pts w/ max imp canines, 8% are bilateral. Imp 2X as common in females as males. Md. canine imp is 0.35%.

Developmental Considerations:
Mx canines have the longest period of development, as well as the longest and most tortuous course to travel from point of formation, lateral to the piriform fossa, until they reach full occlusion. Crowns of permanent canines are intimately related to the roots of the lateral incisors. Broadbent cautioned against early correction of the flared and distally tipped lateral incisors for fear of either impacting the canines or resorbing the roots of the laterals.

Etiology of Maxillary Canine Impaction:
Generalized--endocrine deficiencies, febrile diseases, and irradiation.
Localized (most common)-- (a) tooth size/arch length discrep (b) prolonged retention of deciduous canine (c) abnormal position of the tooth bud, (d) the presence of an alveolar cleft, (e) ankylosis, (f) cystic or neoplastic formation, (g) dilaceration of the root, (h) iatrogenic origin, (i) idiopathic condition.

The presence of the lateral incisor root with the right length, formed at the right time, is an important variable needed to guide the mesially erupting canine in a more favorable distal and incisal direction. 2.4X higher incidence of palatally impacted canines adjacent to the sites of missing lateral incisors as compared with the general population.

Sequelae of Impaction:
(a) labial or lingual malpositioning of the impacted tooth, (b) migration of the neighboring teeth and loss of arch length, (c) internal resorption (d) dentigerous cyst formation (e) external root resorption of the impacted tooth as well as the neighboring teeth, (f) infection particularly with partial eruption (g) referred pain, (h) combinations of the above.

In the 10-13 yr age group, ~0.71% have resorbing permanent incisors due to ectopic eruption of max canines. 80% of the teeth of the teeth resorbed by an ectopic canine are laterals.

Diagnosis of Impaction:
Clinical Eval-- (a) delayed eruption of the permanent canine or prolonged retention of deciduous canine beyond 14-15 years of age, (b) absence of normal (present in 95% of kids age 11) labial canine bulge (non-palpable or asymmetric), (c) presence of palatal bulge, (d) delayed eruption, distal tipping, or migration (splaying) of the lateral.

Radiographic Eval-- PA films reliable for assessment. Single PA to determine mesiodistal and superoinferior position. Use second film to to evaluate the buccolingual position (Use Tube-shift technique or SLOB rule). Occlusal films, frontal and lateral cephs, panoramic films can act as adjuncts.

Proper localization of the impacted tooth needed to determine the feasibility of, as well as proper access for, the surgical approach, and the proper direction for the application of orthodontic forces. Use of PA's to localize canines accurate in 92% of cases, but only 37% of cases were able to project the lateral incisor image away from that of the canine.

Estimates are that 0.7% of the children in the 10-13 year age group have resorbed permanent incisors because of ectopic eruption of the max canines. With tomography, that estimate doubles, with apx half of the teeth showing resorption extending into the pulp. Furthermore, 50% of the resorption occurred on the labial or lingual of the teeth, and would not be detectable with routine PA's.

Prevention of Maxillary Canine Impaction:
Selective EXT of deciduous canines as early as 8 or 9 years of age as interceptive approach to canine impation in Class I uncrowded cases. This done before 11 yrs may normalize the position of the ectopically erupting permanent canines in 91% of the cases if the canine crown is distal to the midline of the lateral incisor. Only 64% if the canine crown is mesial to the midline of the lateral incisor.

Treatment Alternatives:
Consider including the following with treatment planning: (a) No tx if pt does not desire it. If so, the clinician should periodically evaluate the impacted tooth for any pathologic changes. It should be remembered that the long-term prognosis for retaining the deciduous canine is poor, regardless of its present root length and the aesthetic acceptability of its crown. (b) Auto transplantation of the canine (c) EXT of the impacted canine and movement of a 1st premolar in its position (d) EXT of the canine and posterior segmental osteotomy to move the buccal segment mesially to close the residual space (e) Prosthetic replacement of the canine (f) surgical exposure of the canine and orthodontic treatment to bring the tooth into the line of occlusion. This is most desirable approach.

When to Extract an Impacted Canine:
EXT of labially erupting and crowded canine is contraindicated b/c this may complicate and compromise the orthodontic tx results, including the ability to provide the patient with a functional occlusion. EXT may be workable in the following conditions: (a) if it is ankylosed and cannot be transplanted, (b) if it is undergoing external or internal root resorption (c) if its root is severely dilacerated (d) if the impaction is severe (e.g. the canine is lodged between the roots of the central and lateral incisors and orthodontic movement will jeopardize these teeth) (e) if the occlusion is acceptable, with the first premolar in the position of the canine and with an otherwise functional occlusion with well-aligned teeth. (f) if there are pathologic changes (e.g. cystic formation, infection) and the patient does not desire orthodontic treatment.

Palatal Versus Labial Impations:
Palatal imp: Labial imp + at least 2:1 or 3:1. Labial imp primarily caused by arch length deficiency, and may erupt on their own without surgical intervention. Palatally impacted canines are more often inclined in a horizontal/oblique direction, whereas labial impactions offer a more favorable vertical angulation. Yet they are still considered difficult because of the needed delicacy ion managing the associated hard and soft tissues.

Management of the Palatally Impacted Canine:
Surgical methods are: (1) surgical exposure, allowing natural eruption...Useful when the canine has a correct axial inclination and does not need to be uprighted during its eruption. Progress should be closely monitored. A polycarbonate crown may be placed over the impacted tooth after its surgical exposure and cemented. Often, 6 mos-1 yr may elapse before the impacted tooth has erupted sufficiently to permit removal of the crown and its replacement with an orthodontic attachment. If the tooth fails to erupt, removal of any cicatricial tissue surrounding the crown. Takes a long time and unable to influence the path of eruption. (2) surgical exp with placement of auxiliary attachment with applied ortho forces. Attachment can be bonded to enamel or attached to a cemented band or crown. Two methods proposed:
  • Two-step approach: First canine is surgically uncovered and the area is packed with a surgical dressing to avoid the filling in of tissues around the tooth. 3-8 weeks of healing, pack removed, and attachment placed.
  • One-step approach: Attachment placed at the time of exposure after excision of tissues and a periodontal pack placed to minimize discomfort and prevent granulation tissues from covering the attachment before the clinician is ready to apply traction forces on the impacted tooth. Good for palatally erupting teeth with the advantage that when the force is applied, the clinician is able to visualize the crown of the tooth and have better control over the direction of the tooth movement.
The more bone removed initially, the greater the bone loss after ortho tx. Therefore, light surgical exposure and light orthodontic movements and forces are beneficial to the future perio health of the tooth. Only enought bone should be removed to allow for the placement of a bracket and exposure of the CEJ should not occur.

Methods of attachment:
Don't "lasso" a ligature wire around the canine b/c too much bone has to be removed to accomplish this. Heavy exposure increases external root resorption risk from 8% to 14%.

Management of Labially Impacted Canines:
Due to insufficient arch length, the canine may erupt high in the alveolar bone and into the mucosa. Surgical exposure without the application of a traction force is a viable option, particularly in younger patients. The absence of adequate attached gingiva may cause inflammation of perio. It is hazardous to move teeth in the presence of inflammation. Therefore, exposure surgery should simultaneously provide a band of attached gingiva to the exposed tooth. Otherwise, mucogingival recession could lead to bone loss. Prior to surgically exposing labially positioned canine, adequate arch width should be achieved . The created space will also provide an adequate zone of attached gingiva that can act as a donor site for a partial thickness apically or laterally repositioned flap. Keratinized tissue should be placed to cover the CEJ and 2-3 mm of the crown. 3 mm of attached gingiva is considered physiologically adequate.

Orthodontic Considerations:
Prognosis depends on position of tooth relative to neighboring teeth, its angulation, the distance the tooth has to be moved, and the possible presence of ankylosis. Horizontal and ankylosed canines = poorest prognosis.

Fixed appliances advocated in most cases. Hawley-type appliances may be useful in patients with multiple teeth missing.

When applying traction, the direction of the applied force should initially move the impacted tooth away from the roots of the neighboring teeth. Additional considerations: (a) use light forces...no more than 2 oz (60 grams) of force, (b) either availability or creation of sufficient space in the arch for the impacted tooth, (c) maintenance of the space by either continuous tying of the teeth mesial and distal to the canine or placement of a close-coiled spring on the arch wire, and (d) provision by the arch wire of sufficient stiffness (.018 X .022) to resist deformation by the forces. This will also reduce intrusion of the anchor teeth as a reaction to the deflection of a lighter and more flexible arch wire.

If the overall ortho tx plan involves the removal of premolars, it is advisable to postpone their extractions until the canine is surgically exposed and orthodontic forces are applied. This is done to ensure the feasibility of moving the impacted tooth before extracting a workable replacement.

When it is decided to close the canine space orthodontically, the posterior segment must be protracted and the case finished in a Class II molar relationship on the affected side.

Retention Considerations:
Rotations and spacings more prevalent in posttreatment impacted canine spaces. To minimize or prevent rotational relapse, a fiberotomy or bonded fixed retainer may need to be considered by the clinician after completion of the desired movements and sometimes before the appliances are removed.

Monday, April 27, 2009

lit rev 04/22 Subject: Decoronation

Sigurdsson, Asgeir. Decoronation as an Approach to Treat Ankylosis in Growing Children. Pediatric Dentistry v 31/no 2 Mar/Apr 09.

The main problem with ankylosis is that the tooth will not erupt further nor will it allow the alveolar bone to grow and develop and follow the eruption of adjacent teeth. Extraction of an ankylosed tooth can cause osseous defects i.e. collapse of buccopalatal plate and lack of vertical bone height.

After a PDL injury, there are generally 4 possible SEQUELA of HEALING:

1) healing without any root resorption

2) surface root resorption

- histologically:

- mild transient changes to PDL

- some loss of dentin

- clinically:

- no relationship btwn root canal and formation of the resorption

- self-limiting – it will heal with cemental repair w/o any tx

- radiographically: difficult detecting resorption

3) inflammatory root resorption

- histo: resorption of cementum, dentin, and adjacent bone

- clinical:

- inflammatory tiss with continue to replace tooth substance until tx

- direct relationship between inflammatory root resorption and bacteria in the root canal system

4) replacement root resorption aka ankylosis

- histo:

- bone and dentin are as if there were fused together

- PDL and cementum are completely lost

- clinic:

- no way to arrest, it is continuous and progressive but slows when fully grown

- no cemental repair

- no correlation btwn this type of root resorption and the contents of the canal

- no endo will arrest replacement resorption

TREATMENT OPTIONS:

1) Early extraction, esthetic replacement

- difficult to deal with osseous defect from ext

2) Ext followed by ortho space closure

- only if they have crowding

- must be of a certain age because the ortho must be done immediately after ext

3) surgical ext and reimplantation

- only if ankylosis is minimal, detected early, and the patient is near the end of growth

- Emdogain only delays onset of root resorption not prevent it

- risk of fracture of tooth or bone when ext

- if apex if closed or if there is necrotic pulp with open apex, RCT must be done

- affordable and at least buys time until patient able to get an implant

4) surgical block movement (cortical plate, tooth, bone repositioned into more esthetic position)

- patient is fully grown and have minor infra-position of the tooth

- expensive, technique sensitive

5) ext followed by autotransplantation of another tooth

- optimal if : patient has crowding, possible donor tooth – ¾ root growth and prior to apical closure for revascularization of transplanted tooth

- must have good alveolar bone for the transplant therefore decision must be made early prior to severe infra-occlusion due to probability of osseous defect following ankylosed tooth ext

6) decoronation - root submersion and transplant or osseous implant at later time

- few inflammatory changes around the submerged roots whether the pulp vital or endo tx’d

- advantages:

- preserves alveolar process width and height likely negating need expensive alveolar ridge augmentation

- vertical bone apposition is possible after

CASE STUDY

- 10 yr 8 mos male suffered CNS injury and avulsed #9 in an accident

- due to more emergency needs, reimplantation delayed for 12 hours stored in milk

- calcium hydroxide therapy was completed 10 days after

- recalls every 3 mos

- after 1 yr showed replacement resorption, infra-occlusion

- patient beginning growth spurt and recommended decoronation

- mucoperiosteal flap reflected à crown cut off and root reduced below marginal bone à flap closed à crown used as temporary by attaching to #8 for esthetics à 6 mos recalls

- radiographs showed alveolar bone maintained with no significant collapse of faciopalatal width

- ready for implant in 2-3 yrs

Tuesday, April 14, 2009

Upper Airway Obstruction during midazolam/nitrous oxide sedation in children with enlarged tonsils

Shiny Thomas, DDS Literature Review Article Summary 4/15/09

Litman, Ronald S., Kottra, Jennifer A., Berkowitz, Robert J., Ward, Denham S. Upper Airway Obstruction during midazolam/nitrous oxide sedation in children with enlarged tonsils. Pediatric Dentistry (1998) 20:318-320.

Background: A previous publication demonstrated that children who inhaled 15-60% N2O following midazolam premedication had no evidence of UAO despite progressing beyond conscious sedation at 30% N2O. Pediatric anesthesiologists often find that children with hypertrophic tonsils have an increased incidence of UAO during induction of GA for tonsillectomy and several other reports also confirm the potential for airway obstruction in sedated children with enlarged tonsils.

Purpose: The purpose of this nonrandomized, case-control study was to examine the incidence and severity of upper airway obstruction (UAO) in children with enlarged tonsils during inhalation of nitrous oxide (N2O) following premedication with midazolam. This study sought to find if there was a difference in the incidence of UAO between children with or without enlarged tonsils and with or without N2O following midazolam administration.

Methods: Twenty-five children presenting for tonsillectomy and 25 controls without enlarged tonsils presenting for other types of elective surgery in the OR participated in the study. Following premedication with oral midazolam, 0.5 mg/kg, the patients were taken to the OR, placed in a supine position with the head resting in the neutral position, and monitors were placed. Measurements were collected during a 3-minute control period followed by 3 minutes of breathing 50% N2O and oxygen. An unblinded anesthesiologist held a facemask over the child’s mouth and nose without supporting the head or neck, or attempting to maintain airway patency. Every 20 seconds, the degree of airway obstruction was graded as none, partial, or complete, based on clinical signs and capnography. Clinical signs included visualization of chest rise, hearing stridor, and feeling movement of the ventilation bag. Capnographic signs included diminution or loss of the normal waveform. Maneuvers to improve the patency of the upper airway (changing neck position) were attempted only when the patient’s oxygen saturation decreased to less than 92% or if complete airway obstruction occurred.
During data analysis, UAO assessments were confirmed by respiratory impedance plethysmography (RIP). The degree of thoracoabdominal asynchrony (TAA) has been demonstrated to be quantitatively related to the severity of airflow obstruction. The presence of abdominal movements but absence of end-tidal CO2 confirmed complete UAO. Continuous recordings of SpO2, PetCO2, PetN2O, RR, and RIP tracings were stored by a computerized data collection system.

Results: Following midazolam premedication and prior to inhalation of N2O, two children in the tonsillectomy group demonstrated partial UAO (both had SpO2 values>98%) compared to none in the control group. During 50% N2O inhalation, 14 children (56%) in the tonsillectomy group and 4 children (16%) in the control group demonstrated partial UAO. One child in the tonsillectomy group who had partial UAOdeveloped hypoxemia (SpO2). One child in the tonsil group developed complete UAO during inhalation of 50% N2O.

Discussion: The study’s results further emphasize that children with enlarged tonsils are at increased risk for developing airway obstruction after receiving sedation with oral midazolam and N2O. The results of the present study differ from previous ones in that 4 children without enlarged tonsils (control group) developed partial UAO. Limitations of the study were that the investigator was not blinded, combination therapy was used (the results may not be applicable to N2O alone), and the conditions under which children receive N2O and other sedatives during a typical pediatric dental procedure ordinarily differ from the conditions used in this study. During a typical dental procedure, the child may lie semirecumbent and may be stimulated by the insertion of a mouthprop or injection.*External stimuli will ultimately determine the child’s level of consciousness and breathing patterns during sedation and must be continuously assessed by the practitioner with the appropriate monitors and attendant personnel.

Conclusions: Children who receive sedation with oral midazolam and 50% N2O inhalation may exhibit significant UAO, especially in the presence of enlarged tonsils. Presedation evaluations should routinely include questions concerning the presence of nighttime snoring and tonsil size should be assessed during examination of the mouth and airway.

Thursday, April 9, 2009

Making Academic Dentistry More Attractive to New Teacher-Scholars

By Cathy A Trower, Ph.D.

Journal of Dental Education May 2007


Mid 1970’s

  • Almost exclusively male
  • <2%>
  • Sinkford: “stereotypes that categorized women as emotional, undependable, distracting, flighty, lacking in physical strength, undesirable because they are likely to get pregnant, and somehow less capable than males of practicing dentistry.

1984

  • 25% were women
  • Open hostile attitude towards women was ameliorated
  • Last 3 decades increase in women from 1.4% in 1970 to 40% in 2000
  • 37.5% of graduates, but only 15% of active dentists
  • #women in academics has also increased.
    • 25% full
    • 30% part time
  • 18% (10) dental schools now have women deans.

Minorities

  • AA, Hisp, NA make up 12%

Faculty Positions

  • 56 Dental schools 1990 - 2000 had vacant budgeted faculty positions increased over 50% from 238à358
  • Downward trend to 275
  • Significant portion over the age of 50

  • Trends likely to continue
    • Pay gap
    • Student debt affects post grad opportunities
    • Faculty retirements will accelerate
    • Institutions will expect higher levels of scholarship
    • Further budget cuts may exacerbate

Current Faculty

  • 52% part time
  • 74% male
  • 78% white
  • Median age: 52 with 25% over 60
  • Most come from and leave for private practice

Job factors of importance to recent graduates and its relevance for planning recruitment and retention strategies w/in academic dentistry

  • 2001 Project on Faculty Appointments at Harvard: recent graduates of doctoral program planning career in academics
  • Top Job factors:
    • Institutional support for research
    • Time for family/personal obligations
    • Quality of department
    • Teaching load
    • Flexibility of the work schedule
  • (Author says “it’s hard to imagine my dad asking he needed time for family and a flexible work schedule?)
    • Difference is not just generational, but also no longer just white males

  • Break down factors
  • Non-whites vs whites
    • Institutional support for research
    • Similar research interests to those in department
    • Opportunity to work with leader in field
    • Job security
  • Women vs males:
    • Flexibility of schedule
    • Time for family/personal obligations
    • Employment opportunities for spouse/partner
    • Teaching load
    • Geographic location
  • Males
    • Recognition
    • Quality of department and institution
    • Opportunity to work with leader in field
    • Quality of students
  • Overall
    • Meaningful work
    • Balance between teaching and research
    • Live comfortably: housing, commute, schools for kids, sense of community, safetly, job opportunities for spouse
    • QOL
  • Tall order for schools
  • Strong desire for balance is characteristic of Generation X

Gen X

  • Born between 1965-1980
  • Adjective: skeptical
  • Latch-key generation
    • Parents divorced and/or moms worked outside of the home
    • Makes them independent, adaptable, resilient
  • Don’t want anyone looking over their shoulder at work
  • Their parents suffer VDD: vacation deficit disorder
  • They want balance now, not at age 65
  • Quote to sum up X’ers
    • “If they can’t understand that I want a kick ass career and a kick ass life, then I don’t want to work here”
    • “Why does it matter when I come and go as long as I get the work done?”
  • X’ers are hard workers, but they want to decide when, where, and how

Traditionalists (1900-1945) beliefs:

  • If we give into their demands for flexibility, who will dot the work?
  • Job change carries stigma
  • If I’m not yelling at you, you’re doing fine

Boomers (1946-1964) beliefs:

  • I can’t believe the nerve of those X’ers; they want it all!
  • Job change puts you behind
  • Feedback once a year, well documented

Gen X believe:

  • I’ll go where I can find the lifestyle I’m seeking
  • Job change is necessary
  • “sorry to interrupt again, but how and I doing?

Traditionalist/Boomers and X’ers live in different assumptive worlds

  • Fundamental tension: “Who makes the rules” and “who breaks them”
  • #1 Clash around processes
    • Gen X:
      • Want openness, equity, fairness, transparency
      • They see workplace as dominated by secrecy ensuring quality and candor
    • Boomers/Traditionalist:
      • Confidentiality to ensure Quality control
        • Salaries, workload, productivity… to foster community
      • Promotion, tenure process, as well as peer review
  • #2 Clash around research:
    • X’ers value collaboration, but often find competition
    • They enjoy multidisciplinary and problem centered research, but few outlets
  • #3 Clash around merit
    • Empirically determined and objectively derived
    • Absolute standards uniformly applied
    • Treat all faculty equally
    • X’ers see peer assessments is flawed: identical resumes, with identical research, the only difference is a gender specific nameàdifferent evaluations
    • Feel that people in power valorize the norms necessary to remain in power
  • #4 Quality and Quantity of scholarly research matter most
    • View of Gen Xers in that teaching, advising, service to the campus, the community and their profession all matter equally along with research
      • They should not be discounted because they are more nurturing, less visible, not easily documented, or disproportionately assigned to women or faculty of color

Current Beliefs in academics

  • In order to be a successful scholar you need to make difficult choices and sacrifices
    • Place professional above personal: relationship, marriages, families, recreation
  • View basically separates work and family

Emergent view is that overall QOL matters a lot to the individual’s personal sense of satisfaction

  • The lives need to be harmonized
  • Institutions should adapt to these needs and NOT vice versa
  • Otherwise, they will not be able to attract the best and brightest women and men of all races and ethnicities to the faculty
  • If we don’t pay attention to the values of new scholars, if they fail to change the tenure/promotion process, and if they don’t shed the past concepts about academic careers and insist that one size fits all

Tuesday, March 31, 2009

Error and Accuracy Rates of Panoramic Radiography As a Screening Method for Mass Surveying of Children

by Sophia Balis, DDS: Journal of Public Health Dentistry Vol. 41, No.4-Fall 1981

Background:
Advantages of Panoramic Radiography:
  • Produces a radiograph of the max and mand arches on a single film
  • Provides comprehensive view of all structures of both arches including condylar processes, TMJ, sinuses, and mastoid region
  • Simplicity and speed of operation, patient comfort and reduced radiation
  • Exposure req. only 22 sec. with overall avg. time of 3-5 min per patient vs. conventional FMX with avg. 15-20 min. per pt.
  • Cost of film and processing ~50% less than FMX
Disadvantages:
  • Limited definition of images
  • Relatively large initial cost with greater space requirements.
  • Variability in quality of image, depending on head shape and positioning of pt's head.
  • Inferior in diagnosis of carious lesions and damage to the periodontium, but sufficient for interpretation of alveolar bone levels; missing teeth; existing restorations; periapical conditions; malposed, impacted, and supernumerary teeth.
Purpose of This Study: Determine error rates, in terms of false positive and false negative diagnosis; accuracy reates, in terms of sensitivity and specificity; and overall percent agreement of panoramic radiogaphy for each type of oral condition, as compared against two reference criteria of valid diagnoses, under controlled conditions

Materials and Methods:
  • 1202 children of both sexes in mixed dentition of 6-13 years, attending public schools in low-income area of mixed black and caucasion population
  • Compared panoramic radiographic findings with a and with a difinitive diagnostic reference criterion (DDRC).
  • SDRC = Clinical Exam + FMX (1176 subjects completed)
  • DDRC = Clinical Exam and FMX + findings from additional lab and clinical procedures, and treatment intervention to completion (711 subjects completed).
  • See article for breakdown of sex/race of subjects. Diverse population.
  • Study conducted over 3 year period with a staggered procedure that permitted admission of subjects at a rate of one third of the total sample per year.
  • Article describes exact specifics of how to perform panorex, what type was used, and what film type. Performed by trained assistant.
  • An experienced dentist (A1)listed all types of oral conditions noted on panoramic radiographs (3 dentists served consecutively)
Standard Diagnostic Reference Criterion (SDRC):
  • Completed by a different dentist (A2)
  • Included clinical exam, FMX, any clinical and laboratory procedures used in a dental office in order to reach the criterion diagnosis for various lesions.
  • Intraoral projections = 5 max and 5 mand radiographs, including all teeth, their periapical and periodontal tissues, and max and mand bone processes + 2 right and 2 left BWs, each including the crowns of max and mand premolar and molar teeth, and part of cuspids.
  • Upon completion of SDRC, the same dentist recorded a tx plan and classified each pt. into a priority category of recall for tx on the basisi of a 7-point scale.
  • Pts were treated to completion by the same dentist on the basis of their recall schedule. New findings from additional spectialized procedures (i.e. biopsy, medical consultation, systemic evaluations) and from tx intervention were recorded by same dentist. If new pathological conditions develoed, they were classified seperately and excluded from the study.
  • Three consecutive dentists used for this phase.
Definitive Diagnosis Reference Criterion (DDRC):
  • Obtained after completion of tx and discharge of the pt, at which time, a third dentist (A3) completed independently a seperate definitive diagnostic data form. Based on A3's evaluation of the final revised findings of dentist A2's recorded data, together with all radiographs (FMX and pano) and exam reports on file.
  • Two consecutive dentists used for this phase.
  • Independed sets of dentists (A1,A2 and A3) used to avoid observer bias. Reliability achieved by regular monitoring of sample analysis conducted by the investigator. Without 95% congruence, differences were discussed for recalibration purposes, without changing already recorded findings. Recalibrarion repeated over intervals varying from 3-6 months. Examiners also utilized investigator designed reference brochure.
Data Reporting and Analysis:
  • Oral Pathology Classified as follows:
  1. Dental Pathology--Caries of enamel and dentin, pulpitis, traumatic lesions of the teeth, generalized and localized enamel hypoplasia, stains, missing teeth due to loss, retained roots, retained teeth, developmental abnormalities of dentition, and anomalies of spacing of teeth
  2. Periapical Path--periapical granuloma, cyst, abscess, and osteomyelitis
  3. Periodontal Path--marginal periodontitis (noncircumscribing, circumscribing, with pocket formation, with advanced bone destrucion), gingival hyperplasia, and calculus
  4. Malocclusion--excessive overbite (>75%), overjet w/o soft tissue inpingement, OJ w/ sof-tissue impingement, full buccal crossbite, post. crossbite.
  5. Soft Tissue Path--classified as mild, mod, severe, and included inflammatory lesions (herpes, apthae, moniliasis, etc.), developmental abnormalities (ankyloglossia, etc.), and neoplastic lesions (benign or malignant).
  6. Bone Path--neoplastic and other lesions of jaw bones.
  7. Systemic Diseases Affecting the Mouth--Infectious, metabolic, nutritional, hormonal, etc.
  • Data collected and statistically analyzed.
Results:
Conditions Pano was bad at detecting:
  • caries of enamel (missed 100%) but no false positives
  • missed 52 % caries of dentin
  • Generalized and localized enamel hypoplasia
  • Marginal periodontitis
  • Soft tissue pathology
  • Systemic disease affecting the Mouth
  • Malocclusion
  • Malformed teeth (missed 45%)
Conditions Pano was good at detecting:
  • Pulpitis lesions (only missed 8%)
  • Periapical conditions (missed 21%)
  • Missing teeth due to loss
  • Supernumerary teeth
  • Congenitally absent teeth
  • Anomalies in spacing
  • Bone pathology
  • Impacted or ectopically erupting teeth


Wednesday, March 18, 2009

This is an Example

Amazing article about exciting new dental stuff
by Joe Shmo, et.al: Journal of Blah blah blah Vol 12:9 (2008)

  • Write your summary here
  • It's easy
  • You'll be a pro before long
  • Are you excited to get started?
  • I know I am!
  • Woo Hoo!